Response to Well Muddoes regarding Mr. Ingraham “sissy Talk” remarks to Alfred Sears
the intent of words, the meaning of words, the power of words.
The good and the evil that words portray.
sighs.
I have no idea what sissy talk means.
I have heard sissies talked…I usually cringed at their femininity.
Nonetheless, if they are talking sense, I listening
Then I have heard talks that are just sissy talk. Talks of lesser men, puny men. Men who talk in verse and make no sense. A bunch of grand standing type talk.
In our honourable house we have both: sissy talks and talks from sissies.
To be called either is an insult to real men; moreso, is an insult to any man who trying to make sense, as in truth you have been dismissed.
What the question should be is, what type of talks should be spoken in the House. Surely no azzy talks, better yet, certainly no shietty talks or no bungy talks. Yet our prime minister likes to go there. He likes to say shietty things and we laugh and giggle and point.
Here is to the real men in parliament, who are too busy to engage within idle talk. I know they are few, but kuddos to them all the same.
|
|||
|
Uproar over “Sissy Talk”
Parliament goin’ crazy over Hubert Ingraham’s remark about Alfred Sears comments being “sissy talk”. The country and global financial markets are in serious times, and they are using prescious parliamentary time arguing about “sissy talk”?!
|